Regal Nails, Salon & Spa, LLC v. Nguyen et al
| Regal Nails, Salon & Spa, LLC |
| Diana Nguyen and Does 1 through 20 |
| 3:2023cv01201 |
| June 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Larry Alan Burns |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER of Dismissal. This case is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/3/2023.(rmc)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Regal Nails, Salon & Spa, LLC Without Prejudice Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i) (Roberts, Kenneth) (rmc). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (mjw) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Regal Nails, Salon & Spa, LLC. No Parties With Financial Interest. (mjw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1 through 20, inclusive, Diana Nguyen ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17973044.), filed by Regal Nails, Salon & Spa, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1201-LAB-BLM. Judge Larry Alan Burns and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Roberts, Kenneth)(mjw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
