Schaufus v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
| Donald Schaufus |
| Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Does 1-10, inclusive and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2023cv01252 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Bernard G Skomal |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER Granting #11 Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice, Denying #8 as Moot Motion to Dismiss and Dismissing DOE Defendants without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 8/21/2023. (exs)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice as to Freedom Mortgage Corporation by Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Johnson, Nicole) (jmo). |
| Filing 10 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Leone, Fernando) (exs). |
| Filing 9 Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Substitution of Trustee, #2 Proof of Service)(Johnson, Nicole) (exs). |
| Filing 8 Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon which Relief can be Granted (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Proof of Service)(Johnson, Nicole) (exs). |
|
Filing 7
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Thomas J. Whelan Rejecting re #5 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted, from Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation. Non-compliance with local rule(s), The document violates Rule 3.a. of Judge Whelans Chambers Rules. The rule states that Counsel shall obtain all hearing dates from the Courts law clerks before filing moving papers.. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties, Original Document was returned to the filer. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 7/14/2023. (Attachments: #1 Rejected Document)(exs)
|
| Filing 6 Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Substitution of Trustee, #2 Proof of Service)(Johnson, Nicole) (exs). |
| Filing 5 Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Failure to State a Claim Upon which Relief can be Granted (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities, #2 Proof of Service)(Johnson, Nicole) (exs). (Main Document 5 replaced on 7/14/2023) (exs). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Freedom Mortgage Corporation re #1 Notice of Removal, (Johnson, Nicole) (exs). |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Freedom Mortgage Corporation. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by Freedom Mortgage Corporation (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-17991374.), filed by Freedom Mortgage Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1 - Complaint (State Court), #3 Exhibit 2 - Docket (State Court), #4 RJN Exh. 1 - Assessor Report)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1252-W-BGS. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(ggv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
