Williams v. Shirley et al
Kuantay Williams |
Heather Shirley and Attorney General of the State of California |
3:2023cv01320 |
July 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Karen S Crawford |
Linda Lopez |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Central District of California. Case number in other court is 2:23cv06650 (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jpp) |
Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Western Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Western Division*.*312 N. Spring St.**Los Angeles, CA, 90012*. Signed by Judge Linda Lopez on 08/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(bdc) (sjt). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kuantay Williams. (bdc) (sjt). |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Attorney General of the State of California, Heather Shirley (Filing fee $ 5, Fee not paid, IFP filed.), filed by Kuantay Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1320-LL-KSC. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case.(bdc) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.