Ewing v. Rogers
Plaintiff: Anton A. Ewing
Defendant: Charles C Rogers and Chuck "Buck" Rogers Reality, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2023cv01379
Filed: July 31, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Cathy Ann Bencivengo
Referring Judge: Steve B Chu
2 Judge: John A Houston
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to Strike ECF Nos. #7 and #8 by Anton A. Ewing. (anh)
September 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Granting In Part Motion for Extension to Respond to Complaint [Doc. No. #7 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 9/21/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
September 20, 2023 Filing 8 RESPONSE re #2 Summons Issued, filed by Charles C Rogers. (bdc)
September 20, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Charles C Rogers. (bdc)
August 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting In Part Motion for Extension to Respond to Complaint [Doc. No. #5 ]. Signed by the chambers of Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 8/15/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
August 14, 2023 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Plead re #1 Complaint, by Charles C Rogers. (anh)
August 8, 2023 Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Linda Lopez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv1379-CAB-SBC.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (ddf)
August 7, 2023 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge John A. Houston is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Linda Lopez for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv1379-LL-SBC.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (bdc) (sjt).
July 28, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (stn) (jms).
July 28, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Charles C Rogers ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 147123.), filed by Anton A. Ewing. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1379-JAH-SBC. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case.(stn) (jms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ewing v. Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anton A. Ewing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles C Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chuck "Buck" Rogers Reality, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?