Boa Technology, Inc. v. Macneill Engineering Company, Inc.
Boa Technology, Inc. |
Macneill Engineering Company, Inc. |
3:2023cv01431 |
August 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Jill L Burkhardt |
Gonzalo P Curiel |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 Order Granting Joint Motion and Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint (ECF No. #13 ). Defendant's time to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint in this action is extended by 45 days, from 8/28/23 to 10/12/23. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/24/23. (jmo) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Macneill Engineering Company, Inc. . Identifying Corporate Parent MacNeill Pride Group Corporation, Corporate Parent Medalist Intermediate Holdco LLC, Corporate Parent Medalist Holdco LLC for Macneill Engineering Company, Inc.. (Tiberi, Todd) (jmo). |
Filing 13 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint,, filed by Macneill Engineering Company, Inc.. (Tiberi, Todd) (jmo). |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Todd J. Tiberi on behalf of Macneill Engineering Company, Inc. (Tiberi, Todd)Attorney Todd J. Tiberi added to party Macneill Engineering Company, Inc.(pty:dft) (jmo). |
Filing 11 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Zoe Phelps Stendara (Re: ECF No. #10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/14/2023.(jrd) |
Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice, No payment Submitted. (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Stendara, Zoe) (rmc). |
Filing 9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-18099556.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Stendara, Zoe) QC mail sent re missing signature (rmc). |
Filing 8 ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Kevin Michael Bell, re #7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 8/10/2023.(rmc) |
Filing 7 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-18090525.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Bell, Kevin) (rmc). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristopher L Reed on behalf of Boa Technology, Inc. (Reed, Kristopher) (jmo). |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Boa Technology, Inc.. Macneill Engineering Company, Inc. served. (Reed, Kristopher) (jmo). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by April Elizabeth Isaacson on behalf of Boa Technology, Inc. (Isaacson, April) (jmo). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (stn) (anh). |
Filing 2 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *11,633,020*, *10,772,388*, *10,362,836*, *9,770,070* cc:USPTO (stn) (anh). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Macneill Engineering Company, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BCASDC-18075717.), filed by Boa Technology, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Table of Contents, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Exhibit 5, #8 Exhibit 6)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1431-GPC-JLB. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Kristopher L. Reed)(stn) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/8/2023: #9 Exhibit 7, #10 Exhibit 8) (stn). (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.