Johnson v. Sunrun, Inc. et al
Raymond Johnson |
Sunrun, Inc. and DOES 1 through 11 |
3:2023cv01433 |
August 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
Daniel E Butcher |
Consumer Credit |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; And Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher on 9/15/2023.(ddf) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Sunrun, Inc..(Bakane, Avanti) (ddf). |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint: Deadline tofile a responsive pleading is extended from August 11, 2023 to September 8, 2023. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 8/11/2023. (exs) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Sunrun, Inc.. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Bakane, Avanti)(ddf). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Sunrun, Inc.. (Bakane, Avanti) (ddf). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18076064.), filed by Sunrun, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Complaint, #3 Exhibit Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1433-BEN-DEB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case.(rxc) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.