Federal Trade Commission v. Automators LLC et al
| 3:2023cv01444 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
STIPULATED ORDER for Permanent Injunction and monetary judgment. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 2/26/2024.(jpp)
|
|
Filing
48
Order Granting Joint Motion to Enter Stipulated Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 47 ); and (2) Vacating Preliminary Injunction Hearing. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 9/8/23. (jmo)
|
|
Filing
43
Order Granting Motion to Extend Time to Answer the Complaint (ECF No. 41 ) Defendants' answer due 10/23/2023. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 9/6/23. (jmo)
|
|
Filing
34
Order Granting Joint Motion to Extend the Temporary Restraining Order (ECF No. 33 ). the Court extends the TRO until 9/19/23, and terminates as moot the FTC's Ex Parte Application (ECF No. 9 ). Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 8/25/23. (jmo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Federal Trade Commission v. Automators LLC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
