Durham et al v. Forest River, Inc.
Stanley E. Durham and Joyce A. Durham |
Forest River, Inc. |
3:2023cv01477 |
August 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
David D Leshner |
Contract: Other |
15 U.S.C. ยง 231 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER Continuing Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, Case Management Conference, And Associated Deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner on 9/12/2023.(ddf) |
Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; And Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner on 9/7/2023.(ddf) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Forest River, Inc..(Murphy, Thomas)Attorney Thomas M. Murphy added to party Forest River, Inc.(pty:dft) (ddf). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Forest River, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18096936.), filed by Stanley E. Durham, Joyce A. Durham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1477-BEN-DDL. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Soinski, Derek)(ggv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.