Alkhafaji v. Mayorkas et al
Layth Haiderhadi Alkhafaji |
Alejandro N. Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou |
3:2023cv01549 |
August 23, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California |
Allison H Goddard |
Linda Lopez |
Naturalization Application |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas. (Frakes, Linda)Attorney Linda A Frakes added to party Ur M. Jaddou(pty:dft), Attorney Linda A Frakes added to party Alejandro N. Mayorkas(pty:dft) (ddf). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Layth Haiderhadi Alkhafaji. Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas served. (ddf) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons has been provided to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (rxc) (jms). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT For Writ of Mandamus against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro N. Mayorkas ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 147721.), filed by Layth Haiderhadi Alkhafaji. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1549-LL-AHG. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Layth Haiderhadi Alkhafaji)(rxc) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.