Daingean Technologies Ltd. v. Apple Inc.
| Daingean Technologies Ltd. |
| Apple Inc. |
| 3:2023cv01560 |
| August 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 27
MINUTE ORDER: Defendant Apple, Inc. has filed an Unopposed Motion to extend its time to respond to Plaintiff Daingean Technologies, Ltd.s Complaint by 45 days. (Doc. #26 ) The Motion is GRANTED. Apple shall respond to the Complaint on or before 11/02/2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro. (no document attached) (maq)
|
| Filing 26 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (Unopposed) by Apple Inc.. (Batchelder, James)Attorney James R. Batchelder added to party Apple Inc.(pty:dft) |
| Filing 25 PRO HAC APPROVED: Robert Allan Bullwinkel appearing for Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd. (no document attached) (rmc) |
| Filing 24 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-18171221.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Bullwinkel, Robert) (rmc). |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF DOCUMENT #16 by Daingean Technologies Ltd. re #16 Summons Returned Executed filed by Daingean Technologies Ltd. . (Attachments: #1 CORRECTED Summons Returned Executed by Daingean Technologies Ltd. Apple Inc. served on August 28, 2023)(French, Jennifer) (maq). |
| Filing 22 PRO HAC APPROVED: Alden G. Harris, Blaine Andrew Larson appearing for Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd. (no document attached) (rmc) |
| Filing 21 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-18170054.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Larson, Blaine) (rmc). |
| Filing 20 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-18170016.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Harris, Alden) (rmc). |
| Filing 19 PRO HAC APPROVED: Eric J Enger, Michael F. Heim appearing for Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd. (no document attached) (rmc) |
| Filing 18 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-18169974.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Enger, Eric) (rmc). |
| Filing 17 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-18169946.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Heim, Michael) (rmc). |
| Filing 16 **DOCUMENT WITHDRAWN PER ECF #23 ** SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daingean Technologies Ltd. Apple Inc. served. (French, Jennifer) (maq). Modified on 9/11/2023 to withdraw (maq). |
| Filing 15 PRO HAC APPROVED: Michael D. McBride appearing for Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd. (no document attached) (jrd) |
| Filing 14 PRO HAC APPROVED: Justin Yee-jin Chen appearing for Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd. (no document attached) (jrd) |
| Filing 13 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $213.00 receipt number ACASDC-18155127.)(Application to be reviewed by Clerk.)(McBride, Michael)(jrd) |
| Filing 12 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $213.00 receipt number ACASDC-18155125.)(Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Chen, Justin)(jrd) |
| Filing 11 PRO HAC APPROVED: Demetrios Anaipakos appearing for Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd. (no document attached) (rmc) |
| Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-18153921.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Anaipakos, Demetrios) (rmc). |
| Filing 9 PRO HAC APPROVED: Amir H. Alavi appearing for Plaintiff Daingean Technologies Ltd. (no document attached) (rmc) |
| Filing 8 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee received: $ 213 receipt number ACASDC-18153273.) (Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Alavi, Amir) (rmc). |
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge Andrew G. Schopler is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv1560-RBM-JLB. Signed by District Judge Andrew G. Schopler on 8/28/2023.(jms)
|
| Filing 6 Amended REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *10,484,976*, *10,841,958*, *10,932,207*, *1,134,400*, *11,196,509*, *1,134,400* cc:USPTO (ggv) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to District Judge Andrew G. Schopler for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv1560-AGS-JLB.(no document attached) (ddf) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *10,484,976*, *10,841,958*, *10,932,207*, *1,134,400*, *11,196,509* cc:USPTO (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Daingean Technologies Ltd. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (ggv)(sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Apple Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18132071.), filed by Daingean Technologies Ltd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment to Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1560-BEN-JLB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (French, Jennifer)(ggv)(sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
