Palumbo v. Anthony's Glass, Inc. et al
| Philip Palumbo |
| Anthony's Glass Inc., Does 1-10, inclusive and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2023cv01645 |
| September 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| David D Leshner |
| Linda Lopez |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Anthony's Glass Inc. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(ddf) |
| Filing 4 Request for Entry of Clerk Default against Defendant Anthony's Glass, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard D. Gluck in support of Request to Enter Default, #2 Proof of Service)(Gluck, Richard) (ddf). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Philip Palumbo. Anthony's Glass Inc. served. (Gluck, Richard) (ddf). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Anthony's Glass, Inc., Does 1-10, inclusive ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18162733.), filed by Philip Palumbo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1645-LL-DDL. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Gluck, Richard)(ggv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
