Bouman v. County of San Diego et al
| Rob Bouman |
| County of San Diego and Does 1 through 25 |
| 3:2023cv01648 |
| September 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1988 Proceedings in Vindication of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Defendant County of San Diego's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant County of San Diego's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #2 Proof of Service)(Lenert, Ronald) (exs).
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (rxc) (rmc).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Rob Bouman. No Parties With Financial Interest. (rxc) (rmc).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against County of San Diego, Does 1 through 25 ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18165711.), filed by Rob Bouman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affidavit of Successor in Interest, #3 Exhibit Demand for Jury Trial)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1648-W-JLB. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Daniel J. Williams)(rxc) (rmc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
