Aitken v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
| Philip Aitken |
| PHH Mortgage Corporation, Western Progressive, LLC, Does 1-50, inclusive and Does 1-50 |
| 3:2023cv01661 |
| September 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Todd W Robinson |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Philip Aitken (Shapero, Sarah) (cxl1). |
Filing 3
ORDER for Plaintiff TO SHOW CAUSE Why This Case Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction. Accordingly, Plaintiff SHALL FILE a response to this Order, not to exceed ten (10) pages, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Todd W. Robinson on 09/15/2023. (cxl1).
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (stn)(jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against PHH Mortgage Corporation, Western Progressive, LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number BCASDC-18169804.), filed by Philip Aitken. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1661-TWR-BLM. Judge Todd W. Robinson and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case. (Sarah Shapero)(stn) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
