Gonzalez v. Garland et al
Austreberto Gonzalez |
Merrick Garland, Donald W. Washington, Chad Wolf and Steven C. Stafford |
3:2023cv01663 |
September 11, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cynthia Bashant |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Minute Order for proceedings held before Judge Cynthia Bashant: Motion Hearing held on 9/12/2023 re #2 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum filed by Austreberto Gonzalez. Motion denied as same ruling as given in related case 23CV1642-BAS. Case ordered closed. (Court Reporter/ECR Anne Roldan). (Plaintiff Attorney Blake Easton FD and Julia Rosales FD).(Defendant Attorney Charlotte Kaiser AUSA and Jennifer Mccollough AUSA). (no document attached) (sxm) |
Filing 12 STATUS REPORT by Merrick Garland. (Kaiser, Charlotte) (alns). |
Filing 11 REPLY - Other re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #4 Response - Other, #10 Response - Other filed by Austreberto Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Eaton, Blake) (jmo). |
Filing 10 RESPONSE re #4 Response - Other filed by Merrick Garland. (Kaiser, Charlotte) (jmo). |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Charlotte E Kaiser on behalf of Merrick Garland (Kaiser, Charlotte)Attorney Charlotte E Kaiser added to party Merrick Garland(pty:res) (jmo). |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance Replacing Julia Perez Rosales by Blake Jackson Eaton on behalf of Austreberto Gonzalez (Eaton, Blake)Attorney Blake Jackson Eaton added to party Austreberto Gonzalez(pty:pet) (jmo). |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Cynthia Bashant for all further proceedings. Pending hearings previously set before the original Judge have been transferred to the newly assigned Judge. The new case number is 23cv1663-BAS.(no document attached) (dlg) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION #2 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum. Motion Hearing set for 9/12/2023 10:00 AM in Courtroom 12B before Judge Cynthia Bashant. (no document attached) (sxm) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF HEARING (TIME ONLY): Motion Hearing previously set for 9/12/2023 1:00 PM is RESET for 9/12/2023 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2D before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. Federal Defenders to file a reply, if any, by 8:00 AM on 9/12/2023. (no document attached) (ajs) Modified text on 9/11/2023 (ajs). |
Filing 4 RESPONSE re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Merrick Garland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Kaiser, Charlotte) (jmo). |
Filing 3 Order Setting Hearing on Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum (ECF No. #2 ): Government to file a response by 5:00 PM on 9/11/2023. Motion Hearing set for 9/12/2023 01:00 PM in Courtroom 2D before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. (no document attached) (ajs) |
Filing 2 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Austreberto Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Application)(dim) (Main Document 2 replaced on 9/11/2023) (dim). (anh). |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Merrick Garland, Steven C. Stafford, Donald W. Washington, Chad Wolf, No Fee Required, filed by Austreberto Gonzalez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1663-GPC. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel is assigned to the case. (Perez Rosales, Julia)(dim) (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.