United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Southeastern Califoria Conference of Seventh Day Adventists et al
| United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee |
| Southeastern Califoria Conference of Seventh Day Adventists, Does 1 through 10 and Southeastern California Conference of Seventh Day Adventists |
| 3:2023cv01665 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| David D Leshner |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Amended Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (dim) (anh). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (dim) (anh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1 through 10, Southeastern Califoria Conference of Seventh Day Adventists ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18171086.), filed by United African-Asian Abilities Club, James Lee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1665-GPC-DDL. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Wakefield, David)(dim) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
