Bandala v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Javier Marcos Bandala |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Madeline Kristoff and Terri Robinson |
| 3:2023cv01673 |
| September 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Steve B Chu |
| Andrew G Schopler |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 i Immigration & Nationality Act (Definitions) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Javier Marcos Bandala. Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Madeline Kristoff, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit mail receipt)(Sullivan, Christina)(jms). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (rxc) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS against Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Madeline Kristoff, Terri Robinson, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18173029.), filed by Javier Marcos Bandala. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1673-AGS-SBC. Judge Andrew G. Schopler and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case. (Christina Sullivan)(rxc) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
