Trustees of San Diego Associated General Contractors Vacation/Sick Pay Trust v. Pal General Engineering, Inc. et al
| Trustees of San Diego Associated General Contractors Vacation/Sick Pay Trust |
| Pal General Engineering, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 |
| 3:2023cv01720 |
| September 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Roger T Benitez |
| Daniel E Butcher |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 0185 Labor: Suits by and against Labor Organizations |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and due to the Plaintiff filing a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, this case is dismissed with prejudice. See ECF No. #5 (no document attached) (ddf) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Trustees of San Diego Associated General Contractors Vacation/Sick Pay Trust With Prejudice (Freeman, Richard) (ddf). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard M. Freeman on behalf of Trustees of San Diego Associated General Contractors Vacation/Sick Pay Trust (Freeman, Richard) (exs). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Trustees of San Diego Associated General Contractors Vacation/Sick Pay Trust. Pal General Engineering, Inc. served. (McConnell, Matthew) (exs). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Does 1 through 50, Pal General Engineering, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18193453.), filed by Trustees of San Diego Associated General Contractors Vacation/Sick Pay Trust. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1720-BEN-DEB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (McConnell, Matthew)(ggv) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Trustees of San Diego Associated General Contractors Vacation/Sick Pay Trust v. Pal General Engineering, Inc. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Trustees of San Diego Associated General Contractors Vacation/Sick Pay Trust | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Scott McConnell |
| Represented By: | Richard M. Freeman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pal General Engineering, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does 1 through 50 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
