Turner v. Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc et al
| Terrance Turner |
| Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Evernorth Health, Inc, Express Scripts and Kaiser Permanente Medical Facility |
| 3:2023cv01721 |
| September 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| San Diego Office |
| Daniel E Butcher |
| James E Simmons |
| Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER: (1) DISMISSING Complaint Pursuant to Screening UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915(e); and (2) DENYING Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ). Signed by District Judge James E. Simmons, Jr on 9/22/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (maq)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terrance Turner. (rxc) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Evernorth Health, Inc, Express Scripts, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Kaiser Permanente Medical Facility, IFP Filed, filed by Terrance Turner. (Attachments: #1 Complaint part 2, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibits, #4 Envelope)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1721-JES-DEB. Judge James E. Simmons, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Terrance Turner)(rxc) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
