Turner v. Eli Lily Company et al
Terrance Turner |
Eli Lily Company, Cheplapharm Arzneimittel GmbH, Deutsche Bank and USSOCOM Food and Drug Administration, CDC |
3:2023cv01722 |
September 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
David D Leshner |
Jinsook Ohta |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER: (1) Dismissing Complaint Pursuant to Screening Under 28 U.S.C. 1915; and (2) Denying Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Jinsook Ohta on 10/16/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(Copies mailed to the California State Bar and the Virginia State Bar)(exs) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Terrance Turner. (ggv) (sjt). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cheplapharm Arzneimittel GmbH, Deutsche Bank, Eli Lily Company, USSOCOM Food and Drug Administration, CDC, IFP Filed, filed by Terrance Turner. (Attachments: #1 Complaint 2 part, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Envelope)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1722-JO-DDL. Judge Jinsook Ohta and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Turner, Terrance)(ggv)(sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.