Copeland et al v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. et al
| Jean T. Copeland and James D. Copeland |
| Winnebago Industries, Inc., La Mesa R.V. Center, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and FCA US LLC |
| 3:2023cv01738 |
| September 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Jill L Burkhardt |
| Jinsook Ohta |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Jean T. Copeland, James D. Copeland.New Summons Requested. (Dalton, Richard) (exs). |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by James D. Copeland, Jean T. Copeland. No Parties With Financial Interest. (rxc) (jms). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (rxc) (jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Bank of America, N.A., La Mesa R.V. Center, Inc., Winnebago Industries, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18200038.), filed by Jean T. Copeland, James D. Copeland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1738-JO-JLB. Judge Jinsook Ohta and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case. (Richard C. Dalton)(rxc) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
