Poustchi v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company
Zahra S. Poustchi |
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company |
3:2023cv01746 |
September 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Ruth Bermudez Montenegro |
Bernard G Skomal |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 NOTICE AND ORDER: (1) for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference, (2) Setting Rule 26 compliance and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation set for 1/24/2024 at 2:00pm. Joint Discovery Plan due 1/10/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on 11/13/2023.(jpp) |
Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Lincoln National Corporation for The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company.. (Decker, Byrne) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company.(Decker, Byrne)Attorney Byrne J. Decker added to party The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company(pty:dft) |
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER - The parties joint motion for extension of time for Defendant to respond to Plaintiffs initial complaint (Doc. 4) is GRANTED. Defendants response must be filed on or before November 9, 2023. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed District Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro.(no document attached) (jpp) |
Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Initial Complaint by The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company. (Wang, Jenny)Attorney Jenny H. Wang added to party The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company(pty:dft) (jpp). |
Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zahra S. Poustchi. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company served. (Iler, Brooks) (jpp). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (rxc) (jms). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18203454.), filed by Zahra S. Poustchi. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1746-RBM-BGS. Judge Ruth Bermudez Montenegro and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Brooks L. Iler)(rxc) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Poustchi v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Zahra S. Poustchi | |
Represented By: | Brooks L Iler |
Represented By: | Virgil Adam Iler |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Jenny H. Wang |
Represented By: | Byrne J. Decker |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.