Santana v. Garland et al
| Jose Santana |
| Merrick Garland, Donald W. Washington, Chad Wolf and Steven C. Stafford |
| 3:2023cv01770 |
| September 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER denying #2 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum. A review of Mr. Santana's criminal proceedings shows that he was produced for his initial appearance on September 27, 2023, at which time he was arraigned, appointed counsel, and waived a detention hearing (See 23-mj-3251-KSC). Accordingly, the writ of habeas corpus petition is denied as moot and the case is closed. Signed by Judge Cynthia Bashant on 9/27/2023. (no document attached) (sxm)
|
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad prosequendum by Jose Santana. (Attachments: #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)(rxc)(jms). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum against Merrick Garland, Steven C. Stafford, Donald W. Washington, Chad Wolf, No Fee Required, filed by Jose Santana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Application for Writ of habeas Corpus Ad Prosequendum)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1770-BAS. Judge Cynthia Bashant is assigned to the case. (Brett T. Diehl)(rxc) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
