Blake v. Orozco
| Tom Blake |
| S. Orozco |
| 3:2023cv01831 |
| September 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Barbara Lynn Major |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter)(jmo) |
Filing 7
Order: (1) Granting Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #2 ); (2) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of Complaint and Summons Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) and FED. R. CIV. P. 4(c)(3). Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 11/16/23. (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service with IFP packet)(jmo)
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (bdc) (anh). |
|
Filing 5
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo Accepting re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint, #3 MOTION for Order, from Plaintiff Tom Blake. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 10/10/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(bdc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Motion to Proceed With Complaint by U.S. Mail [Doc. No. #3 ]. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 10/10/2023. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed with Complaint by U.S. Mail instead of E-Mail by Tom Blake. (ggv) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tom Blake. (ggv) |
| Filing 1 GO653A COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against S. Orozco, IFP Filed, filed by Tom Blake. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1831-CAB-BLM. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Barbara Lynn Major are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (ggv) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blake v. Orozco | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tom Blake | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: S. Orozco | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
