G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Cole et al
| G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC |
| Geoffery Cole individually and d/b/a Chef's SD, Admiral's Experience, Inc. an unknown business entity d/b/a Chef's SD, Geoffery Cole individually doing business as Chef's SD and Admiral's Experience, Inc. an unknown business entity doing business as Chef's SD |
| 3:2023cv01862 |
| October 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cynthia Bashant |
| David D Leshner |
| Cable/Satellite TV |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 0553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (stn) (anh). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. No Parties With Financial Interest. (stn) (anh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Admiral's Experience, Inc., Geoffery Cole ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18256052.), filed by G & G Closed Circuit Events, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1862-BAS-DDL. Judge Cynthia Bashant and Magistrate Judge David D. Leshner are assigned to the case. (Thomas P. Riley)(stn) (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
