United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC.. v. Diversified Maintenance System, Inc. et al
| United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC.. |
| Diversified Maintenance System, Inc., Employers Mutual Casualty Company and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2023cv01866 |
| October 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Allison H Goddard |
| William Q Hayes |
| Miller Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 bc Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
NOTICE And Order Setting Early Neutral Evaluation Conference And Case Management Conference Via Videoconference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard on 12/4/2023.(alns) (sjt).
|
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Diversified Maintenance System, Inc., Employers Mutual Casualty Company. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Smelko, William) (maq). |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Diversified Maintenance System, Inc., Employers Mutual Casualty Company (Smelko, William) (maq). |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand Defendant/Counterclaimant Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc. and Defendant Employers Mutual Casualty Company's Answer to Complaint and Defendant/Counterclaimant Diversified Maintenance Systems, Inc.'s, COUNTERCLAIM against United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC. by Employers Mutual Casualty Company, Diversified Maintenance System, Inc. (Smelko, William) (maq). |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff and. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/17/2023. (alns)
|
| Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff and by Diversified Maintenance System, Inc., Employers Mutual Casualty Company. (Smelko, William)Attorney William A. Smelko added to party Employers Mutual Casualty Company(pty:dft) (alns). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff A Glasco, Inc. and. Signed by District Judge William Q. Hayes on 11/14/2023. (alns) (sjt).
|
| Filing 5 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff A Glasco, Inc. and by Diversified Maintenance System, Inc.. (Smelko, William)Attorney William A. Smelko added to party Diversified Maintenance System, Inc.(pty:dft) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC... Employers Mutual Casualty Company served. (Tate, Theresa) (alns). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC. Diversified Maintenance System, Inc. served. (Tate, Theresa) (cxl1). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (stn)(jms). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Diversified Maintenance System, Inc., Employers Mutual Casualty Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18258137.), filed by United States, For the Use of A GLASCO, INC... (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1866-WQH-AHG. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Theresa Crawford Tate)(stn) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
