Schmidt v. Accordia Life and Annuity Company et al
Plaintiff: David Schmidt
Defendant: Accordia Life and Annuity Company and Does 1-300
Case Number: 3:2023cv01923
Filed: October 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Roger T Benitez
Referring Judge: Bernard G Skomal
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 bc Removal- Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting Joint Motion For Extension Of Time To Respond To Complaint [ECF No. #7 ]. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 11/27/2023. (ddf)
November 22, 2023 Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, #1 Notice of Removal, by Accordia Life and Annuity Company. (Chau, Stephanie) (ddf).
October 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting Joint Motion For Extension Of Time To Respond To Complaint [ECF No. #4 ]. Signed by Judge Roger T. Benitez on 10/26/2023. (ddf)
October 25, 2023 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Accordia Life and Annuity Company re #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #3 Notice of Party With Financial Interest, #1 Notice of Removal, (Chau, Stephanie) (ddf).
October 23, 2023 Filing 4 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Notice of Removal, by Accordia Life and Annuity Company. (Chau, Stephanie) (ddf).
October 19, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Accordia Life and Annuity Company (Chau, Stephanie) (alns).
October 19, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Accordia Life and Annuity Company identifying Corporate Parent Commonwealth Annuity and Life Insurance Company, Other Affiliate Global Atlantic (Fin) Company, Other Affiliate The Global Atlantic Financial Group LLC, Other Affiliate KKR & Co. Inc. for Accordia Life and Annuity Company.. (Chau, Stephanie) (alns).
October 19, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18281204.), filed by Accordia Life and Annuity Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:23-cv-1923-BEN-BGS. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.(stn)(jms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schmidt v. Accordia Life and Annuity Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Schmidt
Represented By: Alex M Tomasevic
Represented By: Craig McKenzie Nicholas
Represented By: Jack B Winters, Jr
Represented By: Sarah D. Ball
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Accordia Life and Annuity Company
Represented By: Stephanie Grace Chau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-300
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?