Flagstar Bank, N.A. v. Santiago et al
| Flagstar Bank, N.A. |
| Levi Santiago and Does 1-100 |
| Brandon Rustle |
| 3:2023cv02015 |
| November 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Steve B Chu |
| Janis L Sammartino |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Remanding Action to the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego, Pursuant to November 6, 2023 Order. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/30/23.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(certified copy sent to state court) (aas)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Denying #2 Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Ordering Defendant to Show Cause Why this Case Should Not Be Remanded to State Court. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 11/6/23. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aas)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Rustle. (stn) (jms).
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL, IFP Filed, filed by Brandon Rustle. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2015-JLS-SBC. Judge Janis L. Sammartino and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case.(stn) Attorney Maintenance request created for Brandon J. Mika (stn). (jms).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
