Louka v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
| Marvin Louka |
| AT&T Mobility Services LLC and Does 1 through 20 |
| 3:2023cv02031 |
| November 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michael S Berg |
| Robert S Huie |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 lr Diversity - Labor |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting Joint Motion to Continue Deadline to Respond to Complaint (ECF No. #3 ). Signed by District Judge Robert S. Huie on 11/28/2023. (maq)
|
| Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, or Response by AT&T Mobility Services LLC. (Bertrand, Raymond) Attorney Raymond Bertrand added to party AT&T Mobility Services LLC (pty:dft) (maq). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (stn) (anh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against AT&T Mobility Services LLC ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18321062.), filed by Marvin Louka. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2031-RSH-MSB. Judge Robert S. Huie and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (David Hawkes)(stn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
