Fives Investments, LLC v. Nanoleaf Canada Limited et al
Plaintiff: Fives Investments, LLC
Defendant: Nanoleaf Canada Limited and Does 1 to 10
Case Number: 3:2023cv02045
Filed: November 6, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Roger T Benitez
Referring Judge: Karen S Crawford
2 Judge: Dana M Sabraw
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 0271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #7 Joint Motion to extend Defendant's deadline to respond to complaint. Signed by Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw on 12/13/2023. (jpp)
December 13, 2023 Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Nanoleaf Canada Limited. (Connolly, Katherine)Attorney Katherine G. Connolly added to party Nanoleaf Canada Limited(pty:dft) (jpp).
November 28, 2023 Filing 6 DECLARATION Re Proof of Service of Summons and Complaint on Nanoleaf Canada Limited by Plaintiff Fives Investments, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service of Summons, Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet, Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement, Report on Filing Action Re Patent, #2 Return of Summons)(Flyer, David) (jpp).
November 8, 2023 Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Roger T. Benitez is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Chief District Judge Dana M. Sabraw for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv2045-DMS-KSC.(no document attached) (ddf)
November 6, 2023 Filing 4 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv)(jms).
November 6, 2023 Filing 3 REPORT on the filing or determination of an action regarding patent and/or trademark number(s) *9,148,938* cc:USPTO (ggv) (jms).
November 6, 2023 Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fives Investments, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Samir H. Safar for Fives Investments, LLC. (ggv) (jms).
November 6, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1 to 10, Nanoleaf Canada Limited ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18327418.), filed by Fives Investments, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - 938 Patent)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2045-BEN-KSC. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Flyer, David)(ggv) (jms).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fives Investments, LLC v. Nanoleaf Canada Limited et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fives Investments, LLC
Represented By: David R Flyer
Represented By: Raquel Flyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nanoleaf Canada Limited
Represented By: Katherine G. Connolly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1 to 10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?