Armour et al v. Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio et al
| Olivia Armour and Chanel E. Armour |
| Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio, Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund, Fidelity New Millenium Fund, Fidelity Growth & Income Fund, Fidelity Government Income Fund, Fidelity Puritan Fund, Fidelity Gnma Fund, Select Tech Hardware Portfolio, Fidelity Trend Fund, Fidelity Investment Money Market Tax Exempt Portfolio Class I, Select Energy Portfolio, Fidelity Equity Income Fund, Fidelity Growth Company Fund, Select Semiconductor Portfolio, Select Consumer Staples Portfolio, Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class I, Select Chemicals Portfolio, idelity Advisor Income Fund-Class I and Fidelity Advisor Income Fund-Class I |
| 3:2023cv02074 |
| November 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michelle M Pettit |
| James E Simmons |
| Valerie E Torres |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv2074-JES-VET.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(no document attached) (aas) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Chanel E. Armour, Olivia Armour. (maq) |
Filing 3
Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by District Judge James E. Simmons, Jr Rejecting Document: Supplemental Document: State Court Summons Form, from Plaintiff Olivia Armour. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Supplemental documents require court order, OTHER: The Summons form used and submitted is a form from the San Diego Superior Court and cannot be used in Federal Court. A summons will not be issued in this case until either the filing fee has been paid or a request to proceed in forma pauperis has been approved. Rejected document was returned to the filer. (Attachments: #1 Rejected Document) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (maq)
|
| Filing 2 ***DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER #3 *** SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENT: State Court Summons Form by Olivia Armour. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (maq) Modified on 11/17/2023 to strike (maq). (Main Document 2 replaced on 11/17/2023) (maq). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fidelity Advisor Global Capital Appreciation Fund Class I, Fidelity Advisor Income Fund-Class I et al, Fidelity Convertible Securities Fund, Fidelity Equity Income Fund, Fidelity Gnma Fund, Fidelity Government Income Fund, Fidelity Growth & Income Fund, Fidelity Growth Company Fund, Fidelity Investment Money Market Tax Exempt Portfolio Class I, Fidelity New Millenium Fund, Fidelity Puritan Fund, Fidelity Select Technology Portfolio, Fidelity Trend Fund, Select Chemicals Portfolio, Select Consumer Staples Portfolio, Select Energy Portfolio, Select Semiconductor Portfolio, Select Tech Hardware Portfolio ( Filing fee due $ 402.), filed by Olivia Armour. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Envelope)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2074-JES-MMP. Judge James E. Simmons, Jr. and Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit are assigned to the case. (Armour, Olivia)(ggv) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
