Fierrobetancourt v. SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. et al
Diana Fierrobetancourt |
SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
3:2023cv02120 |
November 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
Daniel E Butcher |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference; Rule 26 Compliance; and Case Management Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher on 12/13/2023.(anh) |
Filing 3 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Marrero, Guillermo)Attorney Guillermo Marrero added to party SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc.(pty:dft) (anh). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (rxc) (anh). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1-10, SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACASDC-18358973.), filed by Diana Fierrobetancourt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2120-CAB-DEB. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case. (Ritsa Gountoumas)(rxc) (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.