Rodriguez v. Martinez et al
Petitioner: Pedro Rodriguez
Respondent: Kelly Martinez and People of the State of California
Case Number: 3:2023cv02135
Filed: November 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael M Anello
Referring Judge: Michael S Berg
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2024 Filing 7 CLERK'S JUDGMENT. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Court DENIES Petitioners request for judicial notice [Doc. No. 5]. Because there is no indication that the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has granted Petitioner leave to file a second or successive petition, this Court cannot consider the Petition. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES this habeas action without prejudice to Petitioner filing a petition in this Court if he obtains the necessary order from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court DECLINES to issue a COA.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aas) (jms).
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Denying #5 Request for Judicial Notice; Summarily Dismissing Successive Petition Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2244(b)(3)(A) Gatekeeper Provision; and Declining to Issue Certificate of Appealability. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 1/12/24.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aas) (jms).
January 4, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION for Judicial Notice by Pedro Rodriguez. (bdc)
January 4, 2024 Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 150507, Paid on 1/4/2024 (bdc)
December 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER Denying #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Michael M. Anello on 12/4/23. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(aas)
November 20, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Pedro Rodriguez. (bdc)
November 20, 2023 Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Kelly Martinez, People of the State of California (Filing fee $ 5, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed.), filed by Pedro Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2135-MMA-MSB. Judge Michael M. Anello and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case.(bdc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Martinez et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Pedro Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Kelly Martinez
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of the State of California
Represented By: Attorney General
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?