Taylor v. Kijakazi
| James Paice Lee Taylor |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| 3:2023cv02145 |
| November 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Lupe Rodriguez |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Oscar Gonzalez de Llano on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Gonzalez de Llano, Oscar)Attorney Oscar Gonzalez de Llano added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine L. Parker on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Parker, Katherine)Attorney Katherine L. Parker added to party Kilolo Kijakazi(pty:dft) |
Filing 5
ORDER Granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez, Jr on 11/28/2023. (exs)
|
| Filing 6 Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, Pursuant to General Order 707, by James Paice Lee Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(exs) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF SOCIAL SECURITY CASE ASSIGNMENT. Pursuant to General Order 707, United States Magistrate Lupe Rodriguez, Jr. has been randomly assigned. Plaintiff and plaintiff's counsel are hereby notified of plaintiff's right to consent to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). Provided, as an attachment to this notice, is a consent/declination form for plaintiff to complete. The executed form must be received by the Clerk of Court within 21 days of the date of this notice. The Notice of Electronic Filing of the complaint sent by the court to the Commissioner suffices for service of the complaint. The Plaintiff need not serve a summons and complaint under Civil Rule 4. (jmo) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Paice Lee Taylor. (jmo) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by James Paice Lee Taylor. No Parties With Financial Interest. (jmo) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, IFP Filed, filed by James Paice Lee Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2145-LR. Magistrate Judge Lupe Rodriguez, Jr. is assigned to the case. (Monica Perales)(jmo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James Paice Lee Taylor | |
| Represented By: | Monica Perales |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
| Represented By: | Social Security Administration Office of General C |
| Represented By: | U S Attorney CV |
| Represented By: | Katherine L. Parker |
| Represented By: | Oscar Gonzalez de Llano |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
