Gonzales v. Madden et al
Helidoro S. Gonsales and Helidoro S Gonzales |
Raymond Madden, S. Gates, S. Roberts, Dr. Sedighi, Varajas, A. Ramos, Costa, Kies, Kevin Juarez, Seth Sanderson and Doe 1 |
3:2023cv02181 |
November 28, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Andrew G Schopler |
Bernard G Skomal |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Letter from Helidoro Gonzales. Docket Sheet mailed 1/24/2024. (bdc) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages in Order to Comply with G.O. 653 Section 5 and 6 by Helidoro S Gonzales. (bdc) (anh). |
Filing 4 MOTION to Correct Plaintiff's Name by Helidoro S Gonzales. (bdc) (anh). |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (bdc) (anh). |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Helidoro S. Gonzales. (bdc) . |
Filing 1 GO653A COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Costa, Doe 1, S. Gates, Kevin Juarez, Kies, Raymond Madden, A. Ramos, S. Roberts, Seth Sanderson, Sedighi, Varajas (Filing fee $ 402, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed.), filed by Helidoro S. Gonzales. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2181-AGS-BGS. Judge Andrew G. Schopler and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (bdc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.