Abdullah v. Radel et al
Plaintiff: Hachem Tawfic Abdullah
Defendant: David M. Radel, Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick Brian Garland
Case Number: 3:2023cv02272
Filed: December 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen S Crawford
Referring Judge: William Q Hayes
2 Judge: Thomas J Whelan
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208 (Asylum)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER on #5 Joint Motion to Stay: Joint Status Report due by 6/2/2025.Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 2/5/2024. (exs)
January 30, 2024 Filing 5 Joint MOTION to Stay (Prime, Caroline) (exs).
January 30, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Caroline Clark Prime on behalf of Merrick Brian Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, David M. Radel (Prime, Caroline)Attorney Caroline Clark Prime added to party Merrick Brian Garland(pty:dft), Attorney Caroline Clark Prime added to party Alejandro Mayorkas(pty:dft), Attorney Caroline Clark Prime added to party David M. Radel(pty:dft) (exs).
December 14, 2023 Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF RECUSAL. District Judge William Q. Hayes is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Judge Thomas J. Whelan for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23CV2272-W-KSC.(no document attached) (alns)
December 13, 2023 Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (stn) (anh).
December 13, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Merrick Brian Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, David M. Radel ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18421637.), filed by Hachem Tawfic Abdullah. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2272-WQH-KSC. Judge William Q. Hayes and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Alan M. Anzarouth)(stn) (anh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abdullah v. Radel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hachem Tawfic Abdullah
Represented By: Alan M Anzarouth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David M. Radel
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Caroline Clark Prime
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Caroline Clark Prime
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick Brian Garland
Represented By: U S Attorney CV
Represented By: Caroline Clark Prime
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?