Melcher v. Cintas Corporation No. 3. et al
Alex Melcher |
Cintas Corporation No. 3. and Does 1 through 5 |
3:2023cv02287 |
December 15, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Anthony J Battaglia |
Jill L Burkhardt |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 lr Diversity - Labor |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt: Case Management Conference held on 2/13/2024. Scheduling Order to follow. (Plaintiff Attorney Joel Larabee). (Defendant Attorney Kasey L. Bond). (no document attached) (cxe) |
![]() |
Filing 5 Joint Discovery Plan REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Bond, Kasey) (maq). |
Filing 4 Joint MOTION Reschedule Early Neutral Evaluation Conference re #3 Notice and Order for Early Neutral Evaluation conference, by Cintas Corporation No. 3. (Bond, Kasey) (maq). |
![]() |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Cintas Corporation No. 3. (Bond, Kasey) (maq). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18428989.), filed by Cintas Corporation No. 3.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons and Complaint, #3 Declaration)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2287-AJB-JLB. Judge Anthony J. Battaglia and Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt are assigned to the case.(anh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.