Blake v. Moreno
Plaintiff: Tom Blake
Defendant: N. Moreno
Case Number: 3:2023cv02310
Filed: December 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael S Berg
Referring Judge: Barry Ted Moskowitz
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiffs not receiving notice electronically. (Attachments: #1 IFP Letter)(dim) (anh).
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 (1) Order Granting Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis [ECF No. #4 ]; (2) Granting Motion to File Excess Pages [ECF No. #2 ]; Granting Motion to File Complaint by U.S Mail [ECF No. #3 ]; And (4) Directing U.S. Marshal to Effect Service of the First Amended Complaint and Summons Pursuant to 28 U.S.C 1915(d) and FED. R. CIV. P.4(c)(3). US Marshal shall effect service of complaint. The Secretary CDCR, or his designee, is ordered to collect from prison trust account the $350 balance of the filing fee owed in this case by collecting monthly payments from the trust account in an amount equal to 20% of the preceding month income credited to the account and forward payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 in accordance with 28 USC 1915(b)(2). (Order electronically transmitted to Secretary of CDCR). Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 1/11/2024. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service) (Certified Copy to USM) (dim) (anh).
December 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz Accepting re #1 Complaint,, from Plaintiff Tom Blake. Non-compliance with local rule(s), Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) exceed the page limitations set by S.D. Cal. CivLR 8.2(a) and S.D. Cal. General Order 653A, but include a Motion to Exceed page limitations and/or Motion for Emergency Relief from General Order 653A.; Initial case filings (42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint, Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, etc.) received by U.S. Mail and not properly e-filed in accordance with S.D. Cal. General Order 653A. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record. Signed by Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on 12/21/2023.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(sjt)
December 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement from Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility - Trust Office. (bdc) (anh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Blake v. Moreno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tom Blake
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: N. Moreno
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?