Kinsey v. Hill et al
| Attorney General of California |
| Jonathan R. Kinsey |
| Hill |
| 3:2023cv02325 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Cathy Ann Bencivengo |
| Daniel E Butcher |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Central District of California, Southern Division. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Central District of California, Southern Division*.*411 4th Street, Room 1053**Santa Ana, CA 92701*. Signed by Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo on 12/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Order) (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(anh) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jonathan R. Kinsey. (bdc) (jms). |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus against Attorney General of California, Hill (Filing fee $ 5, Fee Not Paid, IFP Filed.), filed by Jonathan R. Kinsey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2325-CAB-DEB. Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher are assigned to the case.(bdc) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/21/2023: #2 Exhibit) (bdc). (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
