Gomez v. County of Imperial et al
Juan Gomez |
County of Imperial, Raymond Loera, Fred Miramontes, Scott Sheppeard, Pedro Millan-Guzman, Dustin Snyder, Alejandro Tomayo, Does 1-14, Does 15-29, Leticia Plancarte-Garcia, Does 30-44, Does 45-50 and Does 51-60 |
3:2023cv02367 |
December 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Roger T Benitez |
Michael S Berg |
Michelle M Pettit |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 d Civil Rights (Death) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MINUTE ORDER OF TRANSFER. Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg is no longer assigned. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit for all further proceedings. The new case number is 23cv2367-BEN(MMP).(no document attached) (rmc) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (stn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against County of Imperial, Raymond Loera, Pedro Millan-Guzman, Fred Miramontes, Leticia Plancarte-Garcia, Scott Sheppeard, Dustin Snyder, Alejandro Tomayo ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18461759.), filed by Juan Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B)The new case number is 3:23-cv-2367-BEN-MSB. Judge Roger T. Benitez and Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg are assigned to the case. (Marc X. Carlos)(stn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.