In Re Return of $32,000 In United States Currency
Petitioner: Javier Ciscar-Bustamante
Not Yet Classified: Return of $32,000 in United States Currency
Case Number: 3:2024cv00018
Filed: January 3, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Karen S Crawford
Referring Judge: Robert S Huie
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 0983 Civil Forfeiture - General Rules
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2024 Filing 9 Notice: Judge Crawfords Civil Chambers Rules, General Considerations for Written Discovery, and Zoom Guidelines are updated effective February 22, 2024 and are available on the Courts website. The parties must familiarize themselves with these publications. (no document attached) (alns)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER by District Judge Robert S. Huie: On 2/06/2024, the Parties filed a #7 joint motion to extend the #5 deadline for the Government to respond to #2 Petitioner's motion to release property. The Court GRANTS the joint motion for extension. The Government shall file its response no later than 5/08/2024. Petitioner shall file any reply no later than 5/15/2024. Signed by District Judge Robert S. Huie on 02/06/2024. (no document attached) (hnn)
February 6, 2024 Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Return of $32,000 in United States Currency. (LaBuff, Lauren) (alns).
January 10, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren G. LaBuff on behalf of Return of $32,000 in United States Currency (LaBuff, Lauren)Attorney Lauren G. LaBuff added to party Return of $32,000 in United States Currency(pty:inre) (alns).
January 9, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Scheduling Order ( Responses due by 2/8/2024, Replies due by 2/15/2024.). Signed by District Judge Robert S. Huie on 1/9/2024.(dim) (sjt).
January 9, 2024 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Javier Ciscar-Bustamante re #2 MOTION for Return of Seized Property [Corrected] (Barnett, Richard) (alns).
January 8, 2024 Filing 3 Fee for Civil Case Opening: $ 405, receipt number ACASDC-18481615, Paid on 1/8/2024. (no document attached) (Barnett, Richard) (dim).
January 4, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Return of Seized Property [Corrected] by Javier Ciscar-Bustamante. (Barnett, Richard) (dim).
January 3, 2024 Filing 1 MOTION for Return of Seized Property ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number FEE DUE.), filed by Javier Ciscar-Bustamante. Judge Robert S. Huie and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (Richard M. Barnett)(no document attached) (stn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re Return of $32,000 In United States Currency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Not yet classified: Return of $32,000 in United States Currency
Represented By: Lauren G. LaBuff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Javier Ciscar-Bustamante
Represented By: Richard M Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?