Yorba v. Government Employees Insurance Company et al
| Luis Yorba |
| Government Employees Insurance Company and Does 1 to 100 |
| 3:2024cv00031 |
| January 4, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Valerie E Torres |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 lr Diversity - Labor |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order Continuing Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Related Deadlines (ECF No. #11 ). Oppositions due by 4/29/2024. Replies due by 5/17/2024. Motion Hearings set for 4/19/2024 continued to 6/28/2024 at 01:30 PM before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 2/14/24. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)
|
| Filing 11 Joint MOTION to Continue Hearing On Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Plaintiff's Motion to Remand and Related Deadlines by Luis Yorba. (Meagle-Dunn, Colby) (jmo). |
|
Filing 10
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on Motion to Remand and For Attorneys' Fees (ECF No. #9 ) : Opposition due by 3/1/2024 Replies due by 3/15/2024. Motion Hearing set for 4/19/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12A before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 2/5/2024.(dim) (anh).
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Luis Yorba. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand, #2 Declaration of Colby Meagle-Dunn in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Remand)(Meagle-Dunn, Colby) (dim). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by J. Owen Campbell on behalf of Government Employees Insurance Company (Campbell, J. Owen)Attorney J. Owen Campbell added to party Government Employees Insurance Company(pty:dft) (jmo). |
|
Filing 7
Order Setting Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #6 ). Any opposition due by 2/16/2024. Any reply due by 3/8/2024. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 1/12/24.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities)(Wenrick, Courtney) (jmo). |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Colby Ann Meagle-Dunn on behalf of Luis Yorba (Meagle-Dunn, Colby) (sjt). |
| Filing 3 Fee for Civil Case Opening: $ 405, receipt number ACASDC-18474943, Paid on 1/5/2024. (no document attached) (Wenrick, Courtney) (sjt). |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Government Employees Insurance Company. Identifying Corporate Parent Geico Corporation, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for Government Employees Insurance Company. (rxc) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Government Employees Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Geico Corporation, Other Affiliate Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for Government Employees Insurance Company.. (rxc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL With Jury Demand (Fee Paid - Filing fee $405.00 receipt number ACASDC-18474943 - Refer ECF No. 3), filed by Government Employees Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-31-GPC-VET. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Valerie E. Torres are assigned to the case.(rxc) Modified on 1/5/2024 (rxc). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/5/2024: #2 Notice Regarding Payment) (rxc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
