ONeill v. Amazon.Com Services LLC
Enrique ONeill |
Amazon.Com Services LLC |
3:2024cv00045 |
January 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Steve B Chu |
Jeffrey T Miller |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 wt Removal- Employment (Wrongful Termination) |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (McLain, Benjamin) (dim). |
![]() |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Amazon.Com Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Amazon.com, Inc., Corporate Parent Amazon.com Sales, Inc. for Amazon.Com Services LLC.. (Buchwalter, Benjamin) (dim). |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Amazon.Com Services LLC. (ggv) (jms). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18477524.), filed by Enrique ONeill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A to Removal, #3 Declaration of B. Buchwalter, #4 Exhibit A to Buchwalter Decl - State Court Complaint, #5 Exhibit B to Buchwalter Decl - State Court Answer, #6 Exhibit C to Buchwalter Decl - State Court Notice of Service of Process, #7 Exhibit D to Buchwalter Decl - WA SOS Statement of Information, #8 Proof of Service)The new case number is 3:24-cv-45-JM-SBC. Judge Jeffrey T. Miller and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case.(ggv) (jms). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.