Willis-Albrigo et al v. Motts, LLP et al
| Laura Willis-Albrigo and Tiffany Taylor |
| Motts, LLP and Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00148 |
| January 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Gonzalo P Curiel |
| Allison H Goddard |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order Denying Motion to Dismiss as Moot (ECF No. #7 ). The hearing set for 4/19/24, is vacated. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/15/24. (jmo)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER Approving the Pro Hac Vice Application of Creighton Reid Magid (Re: ECF No. #10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice). Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 3/14/2024.(jrd)
|
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Laura Willis-Albrigo, Tiffany Taylor. (Braun, Michael) (jmo). |
| Filing 10 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice, No payment Submitted.(Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Magid, Creighton)(jrd) |
| Filing 9 Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Filing fee received: $224.00 receipt number ACASDC-18662492.)(Application to be reviewed by Clerk.) (Magid, Creighton) QC mailer sent; missing signature. (jrd) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. #7 ]. Responses due by 3/13/2024. Replies due by 3/20/2024. Motion Hearing set for 4/19/2024 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2D before Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 02/28/2024.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(mjw)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Motts, LLP. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Jaycie Cruz In Support Of Motion To Dismiss, #2 Request for Judicial Notice Request For Judicial Notice And Application Of Incorporation-By-Reference Doctrine In Support Of Motion To Dismiss Complaint)(Schmidt, Kent) (jmo). |
|
Filing 6
Order Granting Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (ECF No. #5 ). Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. response due 2/26/2024; Motts, LLP response due 2/26/2024. Signed by Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel on 2/22/24. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT by Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Motts, LLP re #1 Complaint, (Schmidt, Kent)Attorney Kent J Schmidt added to party Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Kent J Schmidt added to party Motts, LLP(pty:dft) **QC mailer on 2/16/2024 re wrong event/correct to motion and reminded party to send proposed order. (jmo). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laura Willis-Albrigo. Motts, LLP served. (Braun, Michael) (mjw). |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Laura Willis-Albrigo. Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc. served. (Braun, Michael) (mjw). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (stn) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Keurig Dr. Pepper Inc., Motts, LLP ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18521745.), filed by Laura Willis-Albrigo, Tiffany Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-148-GPC-AHG. Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel and Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard are assigned to the case. (Michael D. Braun)(stn) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
