Guidry v. Vitas Health Care Corporation of California et al
Kaishauna Guidry |
Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California and Does 1 through 25 |
3:2024cv00176 |
January 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Marilyn L Huff |
Michelle M Pettit |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit: Early Neutral Evaluation Conference held on March 15, 2024. Case did not settle. (Plaintiff Attorney Kenneth W Baisch; Plaintiff Kaishauna Guidry; Defendant Attorney Jesse C. Ferrantella; Defendant Representative VITAS Senior Corporate Counsel Dean Robertson). (no document attached) (sjc) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Joint Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and All Related Dates [ECF No. #7 ]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit on 03/06/2024. (mjw) |
Filing 8 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit: Status Conference RE Joint Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and All Related Dates on March 6, 2024. (Plaintiff Attorney Kenneth W Baisch; Defendant Attorney Jesse C. Ferrantella). (no document attached) (sjc) |
Filing 7 Joint MOTION to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and All Related Dates by Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jesse C. Ferrantella in Support of Joint Motion to Continue Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and All Related Dates)(Ferrantella, Jesse) (mjw). |
Filing 6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings by Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California. (Attachments: #1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings, #2 Declaration of Riti Malhotra in Support of Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings with Exhibits 1-5)(Ferrantella, Jesse) (mjw). |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California re #2 Answer to Complaint (Notice of Removal), #1 Notice of Removal,, #3 Notice of Party With Financial Interest (Skeen, Spencer) (mjw). |
Filing 4 NOTICE AND ORDER for Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference. Early Neutral Evaluation Conference and Case Management Conference set for 3/15/2024 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit. Joint Discovery Plan due 3/8/2024.Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit on 01/26/2024.(mjw) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Party With Financial Interest by Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California. Identifying Other Affiliate Vitas Healthcare Corporation, Other Affiliate Chemed Corporation for Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California. (dim) (sjt). |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California. (dim) (sjt). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18531901.), filed by Vitas Healthcare Corporation of California. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Declaration of Dean Robertson In support Of Defendants Notice of Removal, #5 Declaration of Jesse C. Ferrantella In support Of Defendants Notice of Removal)The new case number is 3:24-cv-176-H-MMP. Judge Marilyn L. Huff and Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit are assigned to the case.(dim) (sjt). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.