Jardine v. Ambrx Biopharma, Inc. et al
James Jardine |
Ambrx Biopharma, Inc., Stephen Glover, Daniel O'Connor, Kate Hermans, Janet Loesberg, Paul Maier and Margaret R. Dalesandro |
3:2024cv00262 |
February 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Steve B Chu |
Linda Lopez |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER: Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and due to the Plaintiff filing a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal, this case is dismissed without prejudice. See ECF No. #4 (no document attached) (ddf). |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by James Jardine (Smith, Evan) (ddf). |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by James Jardine. No Corporate Parents/Interested Parties. (Smith, Evan) (ddf). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (anh). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Ambrx Biopharma, Inc., Margaret R. Dalesandro, Stephen Glover, Kate Hermans, Janet Loesberg, Paul Maier, Daniel O'Connor ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18572006.), filed by James Jardine. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-262-LL-SBC. Judge Linda Lopez and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case. (Smith, Evan)(ggv) (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.