United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Essex JMS Acquistion, L.P. et al
| United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee |
| Essex JMS Acquistion, L.P. and Does 1 through 10 |
| 3:2024cv00277 |
| February 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Karen S Crawford |
| Barry Ted Moskowitz |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Notice: Judge Crawfords Civil Chambers Rules, General Considerations for Written Discovery, and Zoom Guidelines are updated effective February 22, 2024 and are available on the Courts website. The parties must familiarize themselves with these publications. (no document attached) (dim) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (stn) (sjt). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Essex JMS Acquistion, L.P. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18575560.), filed by United African-Asian Abilities Club, James Lee. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)The new case number is 3:24-cv-277-BTM-KSC. Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz and Magistrate Judge Karen S. Crawford are assigned to the case. (David C. Wakefield)(stn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
