King et al v. Monsanto Company
| Michael A. King and Betty Biilings |
| Monsanto Company |
| 3:2024cv00341 |
| February 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| M James Lorenz |
| Michelle M Pettit |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Transfer Letter Received from Northern District of California. Case number in other court is 3:24cv02018, filed 4/3/24. (jmo) |
| Filing 3 Case transferred to District of Northern District of California. Files transferred electronically to: *District of Northern District of California*.*450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36060**San Francisco, CA 94102-3489* (Attachments: #1 MDL No. 2741 CTO - 448) (jmo) (cc: MDL Panel) (jmo). |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (ggv) (anh). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Monsanto Company ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18606314.), filed by Michael A. King, Betty Biilings. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-341-L-MMP. Judge M. James Lorenz and Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit are assigned to the case. (Murillo, Cristina)(ggv) (anh). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
