Dyer v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC et al
| Christine Dyer |
| Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and Does 1-10 |
| 3:2024cv00361 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of California |
| Michelle M Pettit |
| Thomas J Whelan |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 rp Diversity-Real Property |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Defendant's Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6)(Norman, Robert) (exs). |
| Filing 4 Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Cara, Tony) (exs). |
| Filing 3 Defendant's Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6); Memorandum of Points and Authorities (Norman, Robert) (exs). |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Parties [28 U.S.C. 1441(b)] (Norman, Robert) (exs). |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18612896.), filed by Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Table of Contents, #3 Exhibit "1" - Verified Complaint, #4 Exhibit "2" - Register of Actions)The new case number is 3:24-cv-361-W-MMP. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Michelle M. Pettit are assigned to the case.(anh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
