United African-Asian Abilities Club et al v. Pacific Gardens SPE LLC et al
United African-Asian Abilities Club and James Lee |
Pacific Gardens SPE LLC and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive |
3:2024cv00391 |
February 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of California |
Bernard G Skomal |
Thomas J Whelan |
Civil Rights: Accommodations |
42 U.S.C. ยง 3601 Fair Housing Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Entire Action After Settlement (Wakefield, David) (exs). |
Filing 4 ORDER Granting Joint Motion for an Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint: Answer by Respondent due 5/3/2024. Signed by Judge Thomas J. Whelan on 4/22/2024. (exs) |
Filing 3 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for Responsive Pleading and Proposed Order (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(McMahon, Craig) (exs). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should print this summons and serve it in accordance with Rule 4, Fed.R.Civ.P and LR 4.1. (dlg) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACASDC-18626321), filed by United African-Asian Abilities Club, James Lee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-391-W-BGS. Judge Thomas J. Whelan and Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal are assigned to the case. (Wakefield, David)(dlg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.