Kaiser v. Doe et al
Plaintiff: Michael Kaiser
Defendant: Jon Doe 1, Jon Doe 2, Ruby Gonzalas and Jane Doe
Case Number: 3:2024cv00410
Filed: February 27, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of California
Presiding Judge: Steve B Chu
Referring Judge: John A Houston
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Notice of Document Discrepancies and Order Thereon by Judge John A. Houston Rejecting re #3 Notice (Other) Request for Defendant's Names, from Plaintiff Michael Kaiser. Non-compliance with local rule(s). Case is closed per order dismissing civil action on 3/11/2024 for failure to pay fee. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is rejected. It is ordered that the Clerk STRIKE the document from the record, and serve a copy of this order on all parties, Original Document was returned to the filer. Signed by chambers of Judge John A. Houston on 3/26/24.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(jmo)
March 15, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION to Proceed on Emergency Grounds by Michael Kaiser. (bdc) (anh).
March 15, 2024 Filing 3 **STRICKEN PER COURT ORDER #5 ** (bdc) (anh). Modified on 3/26/2024 (jmo). (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/26/2024: #1 Stricken Document Form) (jmo).
March 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION without Prejudice for Failure to Pay Filing Fee Required by 28 U.S.C. 1914(a). Signed by Judge John A. Houston on 3/11/2024.(All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service)(bdc) (anh).
February 27, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Doe, Jon Doe 1, Jon Doe 2, Ruby Gonzalas (Filing fee $ 405, Fee Not Paid, IFP Not Filed.), filed by Michael Kaiser. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)The new case number is 3:24-cv-410-JAH-SBC. Judge John A. Houston and Magistrate Judge Steve B. Chu are assigned to the case.[Case in Screening per 28 USC 1915] (bdc) (anh).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaiser v. Doe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Kaiser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jon Doe 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jon Doe 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ruby Gonzalas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?